By Leonard A. Sipes, Jr. Edited by Cedric Hendricks and Joyce McGinnis
See http://media.csosa.gov for “DC Public Safety” radio and television shows.
See www.csosa.gov for the web site of the federal Court Services and Offender Services Agency.
As all of you know, Paris Hilton is spending some quality time at the Los Angeles County Jail for a probation violation. Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Michael T. Sauer ordered Ms. Hilton reincarcerated after jail officials allowed her to spend her time on house arrest after three days in the facility.
How would you handle the throng of media descending on you and your institution if you found yourself in similar circumstances?
In my 18 years of handling media for institutional and community corrections as the Director of Public Information for the Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services and the (federal) Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency, I responded to a wide variety of media requests regarding well-known offenders. Mike Tyson (on Maryland’s parole and probation caseload) produced endless calls. The “Beltway Shooters” who terrorized the Washington D.C. metro area several years ago were incarcerated in Maryland’s Super Max prison. They and many others produced a fail share of national and international media attention.
The bottom line in media relations is insuring that celebrity offenders are treated no different than any other offender. “Friends” in the media will call for the inside scoop. Relatives will ask for information. Staff will be asked to act as informants. To say that it’s challenging is an understatement.
You will hear the media report circumstances that only people directly connected to the case would know. While it’s disconcerting, it happens all the time.
Staff may talk. Most will not talk to the media, but you should anticipate that some will. Some relay experiences to friends and families who may call the media. This could produce unfounded rumors. Rumors, as we all know, have a way of snowballing wildly. What we call a standard adjustment to incarceration could be major psychotic meltdown to others.
Note that it’s not unusual for the superintendent, commissioner or warden to feed information to their favorite reporters. Yes, it happens.
Your executives (or you) have to brief the governor’s office or city or county executive or their spokespersons. They may pass this information on to media.
First of all, stick to the script. All of us have public information policies or privacy laws to contend with. Stray from what’s permissible, and you will find yourself on the receiving end of negative news. Generally speaking, we can provide name, charge, start and end date, date of birth and confirmation that the offender is in your institution. Medical, psychological, criminal history and adjustment issues (how well they are doing) are off limits.
Obviously, staff operational issues are extremely important. Having the right administrator take charge of the case and making sure staff are aware of what’s coming and what’s expected is extremely important. Let them know that the media may try contact them and what to do.
Some spokespeople decide not respond to celebrity related media requests until release. That’s wise policy. My suggestion is to create an extensive fact sheet on the institution and routine day-to-day activities for all offenders and place it on your web site. That should answer many standard questions.
Note that there is a huge difference between the mainline and entertainment media. The entertainment media knows no bounds. They will probably try to speak to every member of the institution’s staff (and their families) by phone or at home. They will try to visit any offender in the institution just to get a scrap of information or rumor. They will offer all thousands of dollars for a photograph.
Regardless of to the posture you take regarding day-to-day inquiries, you will have to deal with rumors. You need to have updated information sent to you daily. You need to visit the institution so you know the lay of the land. You have to be in a position to respond immediately to inevitable false accusations. While you may refuse to answer day-to-day questions about the celebrity, you do not want triple the number of media at your doorstep spurred by the false belief that you are hiding something.
You need to have the cell or private telephone numbers of the institution’s executive staff and shift commanders to make necessary connections fast. Be sure to brief your executives as to breaking situations before talking to media.
Finally, you may want to be available for off-the-record conversations with a small number of mainstream (not entertainment) media or media management. Why?
Because they want to clarify rumors, your briefings may be your best bet to keep all media under control. You cannot give up privacy act or public information act information, but you can provide access to clarify the exaggerated remarks of informants. Trusted media who know the truth (i.e., no suicide attempts, no hunger strikes, no mental breakdowns, etc.) can be your best friend.
You may want to provide some reporters with quick access by providing your cell phone number. Getting a unique cell phone and number for the occasion would be helpful.
These are the people you will have to deal with after a celebrity driven event. They think you are helping them establish the truth, and you are. But what you and your institution or system get in return is accuracy and some control over the story.
Experienced public affairs personnel, not part-time PIO’s or institutional employees, may want to consider this tactic. There is an art to doing this without violating privacy considerations that veteran public affairs staff routinely employ as needed.
I look forward to your suggestions or comments. Please contact me at leonard.sipes@csosa.gov.
I think celebrities are just any normal citizens. I don’t care how much power, money, or friends they have, they need to be be treated the same as everyone else. Discrimination is what they already have and they like it. If a male celebrity commits a crime, he needs to go and be challenged by the guys in the showers to make sure he doesn’t commit that crime again. Its only fair to everyone not being a criminal.
Celebrities are no more than us, the regular guys… but there is always one or two differences… they have more money than us, and they are more problematic thant us… Fame can change a person… it can be a mess in your heads…
That’s a real problem when you have a celebrity incarcerated. The media is all over it. I wonder how Mike Tyson was treated in jail. Was he really treated like any other offender or was he treated special.
That’s a real problem when you have a celebrity incarcerated. The media is all over it. I wonder how Mike Tyson was treated in jail. Was he really treated like any other offender or was he treated special.
I bet he was really someones boyfriend….no our prison system needs some help. We spend too much money and we dont correct anyone.
Let’s not kid ourselves here. Celebrities are treated differently than normal people when they are in jail. The more famous they are, the better they are treated.
Does it seem criminal charges against a celebrity are treated much like a white-collar criminal charge? Celebrities are given access to rehabilitation for drugs or psychological issues why the average Joe is given a orange jumpsuit instead. Is it then a question of how much value that celebrity is to the people or rather how deep their pockets are, I can not say. However, I do believe that there is a clear wrong to the treatment of certain individuals and a lack of justice against the damages received.
If a male celebrity commits a crime, he needs to go and be challenged by the guys in the showers to make sure he doesn’t commit that crime again. Its only fair to everyone not being a criminal.
I find it amazing to think that there are celebrities that think they are somehow above the law. The law is intended for everyone!
Regardless of to the posture you take regarding day-to-day inquiries, you will have to deal with rumors. You need to have updated information sent to you daily
Celebrities are self-obsessed and society is celebrity-obsessed – where is the sense in any of it ?
Is it then a question of how much value that celebrity is to the people or rather how deep their pockets are, I can not say. However, I do believe that there is a clear wrong to the treatment of certain individuals and a lack of justice against the damages received.
To be honest with you i really hate that fact that we even have celebrities….
Tricky issue dealing with celebrities. After all they are just like the rest of us. But then again sometimes their strange power can be used to support a public campaign, or actually put to a good use other than making themselves more money
Thanks
Celebrities are normal too, just been pushed forward because of their public life. They definitely need to be separated, fame makes them a target.
Thanks
Tony Bocsit